Just got dumped by some blind date that I was set up with. I wasn't upset that I was dumped by someone that I loved as obviously I wasn't since it was only a second date and we really pretty much disagreed about everything. The thing that upset me was that she was pretty , or at least pretty to me, so I tried my best to get together with her even though it meant arranging my schedule to see her on HER spare time which in hindsight I feel like a real sucker and really "whipped".
She had every right to dump me but I hated the reason, "we are very different". For me different is something to be cherished it gives you something to talk about and discuss, that is how we learn, I was truly interested in her rather non medical profession which was very non high power anything and political views as simple and unsophisticated as they were. She considered me opinionated. Well if having opinions is a crime, your honor, I am guilty.
I really wish I could be attracted to all the 35 -40 year olds usually divorced that write to me on line. I feel cursed, in a way that I am attracted to pretty women. Who is attracted to the older unsexy women? Do they just date them because they can't get who they really want. For now I will hold off on dating the ugly "chics", at least until Sat night.
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
Sunday, June 3, 2007
Stop the FAT people !!!
As I slave away sacrificing my life to medicine I would like to think that I am actually doing something good at the expense of my own personal loss, though I have have always had this nagging question in the back of my head.....Am I actually helping society?
There are a few reasons I question if it is actually so. The first is from an evolutionary perspective. If evolution is so efficient, which it is as you marvel at the perfection of the human body and nature in general, who am I to interfere with its own "weeding out" process of those that are sick as representative of a genetically inferior class? How can we do better than nature running its course with "survival of the fittest"? (This only applies to those of reproductive age as those that don't procreate anymore i.e.those post menopause and ill will not contribute genetically inferior offspring, and keeping these sick people alive may actually represent the altruism "gene" which is advantageous to the species in general.)
Secondly I question if medical treatment is actually beneficial to those sick in general. There has been much research in general about iatrogenic (phyician induced) morbidity and moratlity. If taken as a separate disease it would rank as the leading killer. I have seen firsthand that these numbers are certainly underreported. I would say that at least half of the people in the hospital are admitted for reactions to medications such as rebound hypertension (the blood pressure shooting up after somone forgets to take his medication) or hypo/hyperglycemia (too much or too little sugar in the blood almost always induced by either taking too much insulin or by stopping abruptly their diabetes medications.)
I personally am a big believer of evolution and believe (with many others of course) that the route cause of illness is the rapid progress society has made without the ability of the body to adapt genetically. Therefore we have too much food and we still have the appetite "genes" that remain from when food was scarce (see Time magazine dated this week)hence the rampant obesity. This imbalance has contributed to the greatest cause of not only mobidity but certainly mortality as well. Every one of the leading killers can directly be linked to obesity. WE NEED TO FOCUS ON CEASING TO TAKE THE SHORT TERM APPROACH OF MEDICATING OUR PROBLEMS AWAY. We need to eat less and exercise more if we really want to improve our health.
There are a few reasons I question if it is actually so. The first is from an evolutionary perspective. If evolution is so efficient, which it is as you marvel at the perfection of the human body and nature in general, who am I to interfere with its own "weeding out" process of those that are sick as representative of a genetically inferior class? How can we do better than nature running its course with "survival of the fittest"? (This only applies to those of reproductive age as those that don't procreate anymore i.e.those post menopause and ill will not contribute genetically inferior offspring, and keeping these sick people alive may actually represent the altruism "gene" which is advantageous to the species in general.)
Secondly I question if medical treatment is actually beneficial to those sick in general. There has been much research in general about iatrogenic (phyician induced) morbidity and moratlity. If taken as a separate disease it would rank as the leading killer. I have seen firsthand that these numbers are certainly underreported. I would say that at least half of the people in the hospital are admitted for reactions to medications such as rebound hypertension (the blood pressure shooting up after somone forgets to take his medication) or hypo/hyperglycemia (too much or too little sugar in the blood almost always induced by either taking too much insulin or by stopping abruptly their diabetes medications.)
I personally am a big believer of evolution and believe (with many others of course) that the route cause of illness is the rapid progress society has made without the ability of the body to adapt genetically. Therefore we have too much food and we still have the appetite "genes" that remain from when food was scarce (see Time magazine dated this week)hence the rampant obesity. This imbalance has contributed to the greatest cause of not only mobidity but certainly mortality as well. Every one of the leading killers can directly be linked to obesity. WE NEED TO FOCUS ON CEASING TO TAKE THE SHORT TERM APPROACH OF MEDICATING OUR PROBLEMS AWAY. We need to eat less and exercise more if we really want to improve our health.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)